The conversation with Federico got interesting, made some good questions and then I decided to post it here, obviously with their consent.
We spoke in the last entry about the interview, the "dossier" and scores. I leave the first comment from Frederick (up to you to figure out who said what, try to help with the distribution of the paragraphs): Very good
the score. Honestly, I did the online assessment as well he sent me everything but I do not know what my score today (and I have the interview in 19 days).
With respect to file, in my case I did for two reasons:
1) in case if they ask me, and
2) because ultimately it for me to know where I'm going, I need to know of As input I will spend on rent, store, transport, schools where I have my children ... Without a doubt I think this is one of those cases where one might say, "What does not hurt that abounds." :) Or not?
1) in case if they ask me, and
2) because ultimately it for me to know where I'm going, I need to know of As input I will spend on rent, store, transport, schools where I have my children ... Without a doubt I think this is one of those cases where one might say, "What does not hurt that abounds." :) Or not?
> Men Fede, I recommend that you compute your score. I know of a couple who were denied entry papers. They appealed and were able to go to the interview. There, they were denied the CSQ and now must appeal again. If they had taken his score calculated could have given the fight there.
Juan Diego, in our case, we sent all 20 days and sent us a letter saying that he had reviewed the record and soon we would quote interview. And why, for example, the level of French is declare some (level 2 - elementary for my wife, and level 3 basic for me). Actually, I thought I would ask that complements the papers by sending a language test, for example, but not, it is seen that achieved with the certificate of the Alliance Francaise, where I am studying.
De cuelquier way, I think excellent choice to be clear what our score, "you know where I can get you some documentation that explains well what does each item score? At some point someone handed me something, but it was not very clear so I never used it.
> The fact that been summoned to interview is not guaranteed. Points could still lacking for the next stage. Scores can be read at:
No no, I know that is no guarantee, but I think if you go prepared and informed to the interview, and all the papers that are sent in order, and one did not lie in anything, I reckon it will not be as difficult to swallow. Or not? What I've heard comments ranging from saying that the interviewers are terrible and try to pass not, to others who say it is just a formality to validate what you sent and your enthusiasm and information about Quebec and it's weird that you reject ... Anyway, we are doing our best trying to think like that is a difficult process, and if afterwards it is easy to welcome it ...
> No. It could be that the officer was "wrong" by calculating your score. It is a human, after all. It is not a formality! In law, you read that one should spend minimum two stops. One, to cite you to the interview. And another different and greater so you'll get the CSQ.
I ask the way, how do I get for language score? There simply says that the maximum is 16 in French and 6 in English, but I do not know how to weigh based on the scale of 12 levels of demand certificate giving selection.
> That's a good question and I have no answer. Perhaps in proportion? If you put 12 on demand, will give 16? If you put 6, will give 8? The question will also be on the blog, if anyone knows.
Now I worry .... assuming that the calculation is proportional as you mentioned, and that I was mistaken about anything else, I get 57 points, which is the limit of the preliminary evaluation. Selection is 63, and the only variables that I have set are the points that the interviewer put me in Adaptability (maximum 6) and if I score improves French (keep in mind that I'm figuring with a level 3 for which I sent a certificate of the Alliance de Langue Fr 2 and now I am studying something I have Langue 4 ... have learned!)
> Yes Adaptability. That's the point. The guy has to see how easy you are going to integrate.
we return to the starting point, hahaha. For this I am putting together the dossier, to try to prove that I am well informed and I know how I'm going to find ... Hopefully it serves.
0 comments:
Post a Comment